
The Inspector General for Personal Data Protection sent the Second Eurodac Inspection Report to various public administration authorities and NGOs with a request for comments and remarks.
The Inspector General for Personal Data Protection requested numerous public sector entities and NGOs to report comments and remarks on the second coordinated inspection of a large-scale database that contains fingerprints of asylum seekers in order to assist asylum procedures in the European Union. The report was adopted by the Eurodac Supervision Coordination Group, composed of the Inspector General for Personal Data Protection and representatives of other participating data protection authorities and the European Data Protection Supervisor. The Coordination Group has investigated how the database has been used in practice over the last two years. Two main issues were scrutinised: the right of information of asylum seekers and the methods for assessing the age of young asylum seekers in view of their registration in the system.
The report presents both the findings and the recommendations based on the replies to the questionnaire received from all the Member States. The Group hopes that the report will usefully contribute to the ongoing revision of the Eurodac and Dublin Regulations.
Informing the data subjects
The inspection results show that information disclosed to asylum seekers on their rights and the use of their data is often incomplete, especially in relation to the consequence of fingerprinting and the right of access to and rectification of data. The information provided to the data subjects differ very much among the countries and it is evident that there the practices differ for asylum seekers and illegal aliens; in general illegal aliens receive undoubtedly less information, and in some cases, do not receive information at all.
The coordination group recommends the following:
Assesment of the age of young asylum seekers
According to the Eurodac Regulation, children from 14 years on should be fingerprinted. There is often a problem determining the age of a child who carries no reliable identity document and various methods are used to assess their age, including various medical examinations.
The Group recommends the following: